Mahaswamigal speaks about our spiritual bankruptcy and the way to tackle it.
Courtesy: Kamakoti.org
http://www.kamakoti.org/kamakoti/stotra/acharyascall/bookview.php?chapnum=7
Courtesy: Kamakoti.org
http://www.kamakoti.org/kamakoti/stotra/acharyascall/bookview.php?chapnum=7
We have the rare privilege of being born as human beings and we
desire to live happily in this world. Pain and sorrow, trials and tribulations,
these provide the incentive to think about the course of our lives, about the
causes of our grief, and the way to overcome them. Our present troubles are the
effect of some cause, near or remote. This ultimate cause of our suffering must
be spotted out and destroyed. All other remedies will be only temporary and
palliative. If the root cause of the suffering is not tackled, the suffering is
bound to recur, if not in the same form, in some other form.
Great religious leaders directed their attention to the
discovery of the root cause of suffering, and each of them offered a solution,
which he felt, was the best to eradicate the root cause. The Buddha was
oppressed by the sufferings he found all around him. He wanted to find a
solution and help mankind to overcome those sufferings. He realized that he
could help others only if he found enlightenment in himself. He went in quest
of this enlightenment. He sought out various teachers; but none of the methods
suggested by them appealed to him. Finally he sat in meditation under the Bodhi
tree and enlightenment dawned on him. He formulated his theory of illusion (soonya vaadam). He felt that the only way to remain
unaffected by any trouble is to realize that everything in the world is an
illusion, and, in that realization, to remain unaffected by pain as well as
pleasure.
Christianity did not correlate sin and sufferings as cause and
effect. According to it, men are sinners, and can expiate their sins only by
believing in Christ. It also averred that the present life is the only life
vouchsafed to us, and salvation is a case of now or never. There is no future
or past life according to that religion. It is the same with Islam also. Belief
in Christ or Prophet Mohammed, as the case may be, is the only way to go to
heaven. According to both these religions, the unbelievers went to hell. As
these two religions did not believe in another birth after the present one, the
entire emphasis in their teachings was on going to heaven after death.
Hinduism, on the other hand, postulates a series of births, and
proclaims that the sorrows and sufferings of each life, like its joys, are the
result of our karmas (deeds) in our past lives. Consequently the Hindus do not speak
of eternal damnation, as the Christians and Muslims do. The Buddha too believed
in karmas and cycle of births because he was the product of the Vedic
tradition.
The logical consequence of the assertion that only those who
believed in Christ or in Prophet Mohammed, as the case may be, will go to
heaven, is that those who were born in the world before the advent of Christ or
Prophet did not attain salvation. This position cannot be acceptable. Moreover,
these two religions did not give a rational explanation for present sufferings
or provide a remedy for them. The Hindu theory of karma and cycle of births and deaths alone offered a
satisfactory explanation. Each person has "earned" the sorrows of his
present life, as he has "earned" its joys, by his karmas in a previous life, and can "earn"
happiness in his present and future lives, by the performance of goodkarmas.
The special feature of Hindu religion is that there is no
sanction in the Sastras for proselytisation. But other religions believe in conversion.
Some people are genuinely worried over the gradual depletion of the Hindu fold
by conversion to other religions and ask whether we should not also do
propaganda for our religion and adopt the method of congregational worship
prevailing in other religions. This view led to the founding of the Brahmo
Samaj, the Arya Samaj, and the Hindu MahaSabha. But their hold on the public has
weakened after the passing away of the founders of these movements.
If there is no suffering in this world, there can obviously be
no scope for religious propaganda or for conversion. A passenger getting down
from a train is besieged by drivers of a variety of conveyances, each claiming
merit for his conveyance and trying to get the "fare" for himself.
The object of all of them is to take the traveler to his destination. Similarly
missionaries of each religion try to get at the suffering man and tell him that
by embracing that particular religion, he will go to heaven. Christianity has
spread in the world through the enthusiasm of the evangelist missionary, who
sincerely feels that his is the last and truest word in religion. To save the
heathen soul, he uses the unlimited monetary resources behind him, feeling that
there is nothing wrong in offering inducements like jobs, medical relief and
education, in order to get converts, whose souls, he sincerely believes, will
thereby be saved. According to historians, Islam forged ahead with the help of
the sword. The Muslim religious leaders obviously felt honestly that even
threat can be employed to rescue the unbeliever.
Buddhism preached ahimsa and universal love. The love (anbu-அன்பு) that overflowed the
heart of the Buddha and his sincere disciples, attracted people to that
religion. The spring of life or 'uyirnilai' (உயிர்நிலை) of Buddhism is this outflow of love. The uyirnilai of Hinduism is the generation of love in
others by the precept and practice of highly developed individual souls. The
scrupulous adherence tokarmaanushtana (observance of religious discipline and practices) and the moral
excellence (aatma guna)
of great men account for the survival of Hindu religion in such large measure,
in spite of vicissitudes. The spiritual eminence of these few men and their
all-embracing love, sustained the faith of the multitude, who felt drawn
towards them, like bees to flowers and bats to fruits. Buddhism laid emphasis
on the practice of love to all; in Hinduism, the cardinal principle is to
develop that love in oneself as the fragrance of the soul. The great men of the
Hindu religion did not profess to uplift or save others by their teachings;
they made themselves pure and their precept and practice made for the spiritual
education of those who came in contact with them. One, who is not himself pure,
cannot teach others to be so.
There is evidence to show that the Vedic religion is the most
ancient religion and was once current in most parts of the world. Now it has
shrunk within the confines of this country, as new religions gained their hold
in other lands. Why and how did these new religions appear and how did they
grow? The reason is to be sought in our faltering allegiance to the Vedic
religion and our fitful observance of its practices. The "weakness"
of our religion, about which people are worried, is not due to our not doing
propaganda for it, but to our own lack of faith in it and our own failure to
conform to its tenets. In fact, propaganda is not sanctioned, for, it is
enjoined that one should not be told unasked and one who has no devotion,
should not be told the truth (Naaprishtah kasyachit brooyat, naabhaktaaya kadachana (नाऽपृष्ट: कस्यचित् बूयात् नाऽभक्ताय कदाचित्).
The strength of a religion does not lie in the numbers of those who practice it; but in the conduct of those who practice it. The best "propagandist" for the Hindu religion is the Hindu who lives up to its tenets. It is on account of such great men that our religion survives even to-day.
The strength of a religion does not lie in the numbers of those who practice it; but in the conduct of those who practice it. The best "propagandist" for the Hindu religion is the Hindu who lives up to its tenets. It is on account of such great men that our religion survives even to-day.
Another significant feature of our religion is that it has no
name, because at one time no other religion existed. As it taught the practice
of eternal dharma, it was referred to only as Sanaatana Dharma. When other
religions came into existence, they were called by the names of their founders,
to distinguish them from the prevailing Vedic religion. To preserve our
religion, it is wrong to resort to the methods employed by the competing
religions. On the other hand, we should fall back on the uyirnilai (life breath) of our own religion, i.e., on karmaanushtaana as taught in it. There is no need even to
combine in congregational patterns. Ours is purely a religion of the
individual. When an individual perfects himself, his example will be emulated
by others. The true prayer is not for getting relief from suffering, but for
keeping out evil thoughts from the mind and for making good thoughts always
dwell there. When misfortunes one after another overtook the Pandavas, Kunti
prayed that they should be vouchsafed strength to remember God constantly.
According to Hinduism, the only way to get rid of sin is to perform the
prescribed karmas by which the accrued sins will be expiated and fresh sins
will be warded off. The discipline ofkarmaanushtaana will make for health and for purity of body
and mind. The way of religion is not to grieve over suffering, but to pray that
evil thought may not get a foot-hold in the mind in moments of distress. Then
the power of endurance will develop and suffering itself will lose its sting.
Such a perspective is the outcome of jnana and jnana has to be acquired by each individual by his
own efforts. That is why our religion is individualistic and not congregational
in nature. Even when untouchability is observed, there is no hatred behind it,
like the racial hatred of Africa. Universal love always prevails and that is
the reason why in spite of strong temptations, a large section of the Hindu
community refuses to change the faith. This should make us bestir ourselves and
to see that this climate of love is felt by all. This can be done by our
getting over our spiritual bankruptcy and producing living examples of
austerity and devotion (karmaanushtaana bhakti). The vitality and endurance of our religion depend on our
individual purity. If it declines due to lack of propaganda or due to
conversion, there is no need for alarm. But nothing will hasten the decay of
Hinduism so much as the moral weakness and spiritual bankruptcy of each one of
us.
A religion that depends for its propagation on the power of
wealth or force must decline when another religion which has the backing of
greater wealth or mightier force comes into existence. But a religion like
ours, whose strength is derived from the purity of the individual adherent, has
no such fears. We require enthusiasm not to save others, but to save (purify)
ourselves. If we purify ourselves through prayer, meditation, and other forms
of discipline, enjoined by our religion, Love, that is God, will dwell in our
hearts and direct our deeds. That will give us the enlightenment to realize the
oneness off the Seer and the Seen. Living examples of such realized souls will
help our religion to withstand all vicissitudes and promote universal welfare.
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக